Texas Constitution:Article III, Section 34 - Revision history

Admin at 14:55, June 9, 2024

2024-06-09T14:55:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:55, June 9, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution (''<small>"Defeated Bills and Resolutions"</small>'')}}{{Texas Constitution\|text=Adopted February 15, 1876:		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution (''<small>"Defeated Bills and Resolutions"</small>'')}}{{Texas Constitution\|text=Adopted February 15, 1876:

	After a bill has been considered and defeated by either House of the Legislature, no bill containing the same substance, shall be passed into a law during the same session. After a resolution has been acted on and defeated, no resolution containing the same substance, shall be considered at the same session.		'''After a bill has been considered and defeated by either House of the Legislature, no bill containing the same substance, shall be passed into a law during the same session. After a resolution has been acted on and defeated, no resolution containing the same substance, shall be considered at the same session.'''

	\|editor=		\|editor=

Admin at 14:27, June 9, 2024

2024-06-09T14:27:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:27, June 9, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution (''<small>"Defeated Bills and Resolutions"</small>'')}}{{Texas Constitution\|text=Adopted February 15, 1876:		{{DISPLAYTITLE:Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution (''<small>"Defeated Bills and Resolutions"</small>'')}}{{Texas Constitution\|text=Adopted February 15, 1876:

	~~'''~~After a bill has been considered and defeated by either House of the Legislature, no bill containing the same substance, shall be passed into a law during the same session. After a resolution has been acted on and defeated, no resolution containing the same substance, shall be considered at the same session.~~'''~~		After a bill has been considered and defeated by either House of the Legislature, no bill containing the same substance, shall be passed into a law during the same session. After a resolution has been acted on and defeated, no resolution containing the same substance, shall be considered at the same session.

	\|editor=		\|editor=

Admin: Text replacement - "|seo_image=Texas_Constitution_of_1876_Article_3.jpg" to "|seo_image=mod_Texas_Constitution_of_1876_Article_3.jpg"

2024-06-02T19:41:32Z

Text replacement - "|seo_image=Texas_Constitution_of_1876_Article_3.jpg" to "|seo_image=mod_Texas_Constitution_of_1876_Article_3.jpg"

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:41, June 2, 2024
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|seo_keywords=Article 3 Section 34, defeated bills, defeated resolutions		\|seo_keywords=Article 3 Section 34, defeated bills, defeated resolutions
	\|seo_description=The legislative power of Texas is vested in a Senate and House of Representatives.		\|seo_description=The legislative power of Texas is vested in a Senate and House of Representatives.
	\|seo_image=~~Texas_Constitution_of_1876_Article_3~~.jpg		\|seo_image=mod_Texas_Constitution_of_1876_Article_3.jpg
	\|seo_image_alt=Article III: Legislative Department		\|seo_image_alt=Article III: Legislative Department

Admin at 21:42, August 2, 2023

2023-08-02T21:42:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, August 2, 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|historic=		\|historic=

	* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . . It would be our pleasure, because the particular piece of legislation under review, if it does not do full justice to an underpaid judiciary, is at least a commendable effort to do so.")		* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44-45] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . . It would be our pleasure, because the particular piece of legislation under review, if it does not do full justice to an underpaid judiciary, is at least a commendable effort to do so.")

	\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")		\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")

Admin at 21:42, August 2, 2023

2023-08-02T21:42:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:42, August 2, 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|historic=		\|historic=

	* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . . [I]t would be both our duty and pleasure to uphold the law. It would be our duty because statutes should not be annulled by the courts merely because doubts may be suggested as to their constitutionality, and in this case we are not in doubt. It would be our pleasure, because the particular piece of legislation under review, if it does not do full justice to an underpaid judiciary, is at least a commendable effort to do so.")		* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . . It would be our pleasure, because the particular piece of legislation under review, if it does not do full justice to an underpaid judiciary, is at least a commendable effort to do so.")

	\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")		\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")

Admin at 21:41, August 2, 2023

2023-08-02T21:41:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:41, August 2, 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|historic=		\|historic=

	* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . .")		* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . . [I]t would be both our duty and pleasure to uphold the law. It would be our duty because statutes should not be annulled by the courts merely because doubts may be suggested as to their constitutionality, and in this case we are not in doubt. It would be our pleasure, because the particular piece of legislation under review, if it does not do full justice to an underpaid judiciary, is at least a commendable effort to do so.")

	\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")		\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")

Admin at 21:39, August 2, 2023

2023-08-02T21:39:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, August 2, 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|historic=		\|historic=

	* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=~~4 46~~] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) (" ... .")		* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . .")

	\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")		\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")

Admin at 21:35, August 2, 2023

2023-08-02T21:35:46Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:35, August 2, 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|historic=		\|historic=

	* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [ ] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) (" ... .")		* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=4 46] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) (" ... .")

	\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")		\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")

Admin at 21:33, August 2, 2023

2023-08-02T21:33:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:33, August 2, 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|historic=		\|historic=

	King v. Terrell, 218 S.W. 42 (Tex.Civ.App.~~--Austin~~ 1920, ~~writ refd~~)		* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [ ] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) (" ... .")

	\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")		\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")

Admin at 21:27, August 2, 2023

2023-08-02T21:27:04Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:27, August 2, 2023
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|historic=		\|historic=

	~~None~~.		King v. Terrell, 218 S.W. 42 (Tex.Civ.App.--Austin 1920, writ refd)

	\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")		\|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")