Texas Constitution talk:Article I, Section 19 - Revision history

Admin at 13:35, June 19, 2025

2025-06-19T13:35:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:35, June 19, 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

	~~== add ==~~

	TSC 23-0697 {"The Texas Constitution provides that '[n]o citizen of this State shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges or immunities, or in any manner disfranchised, except by the due course of the law of the land.' TEX. CONST. art. I, § 19.")

74.194.29.76: /* add */ new section

2024-06-28T19:01:15Z

add: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, June 28, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

			== add ==

			TSC 23-0697 {"The Texas Constitution provides that '[n]o citizen of this State shall be deprived of life, liberty, property, privileges or immunities, or in any manner disfranchised, except by the due course of the law of the land.' TEX. CONST. art. I, § 19.")

74.194.29.76 at 13:59, June 10, 2024

2024-06-10T13:59:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:59, June 10, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

	~~==add==~~

	~~https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9133421901754640670~~

	TSC 23-0629 (Tex. 2024) (footnotes omitted) ("The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no citizen 'shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law of the land.' An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights. We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court's order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.")

74.194.29.76 at 21:05, June 9, 2024

2024-06-09T21:05:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, June 9, 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==add==		==add==

			https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9133421901754640670

	TSC 23-0629 (Tex. 2024) (footnotes omitted) ("The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no citizen 'shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law of the land.' An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights. We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court's order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.")		TSC 23-0629 (Tex. 2024) (footnotes omitted) ("The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no citizen 'shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law of the land.' An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights. We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court's order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.")

Admin: /* add */

2024-06-01T15:34:57Z

add

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, June 1, 2024
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==add==		==add==

	TSC 23-0629 (footnotes omitted) ("The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no citizen 'shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law of the land.' An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights. We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court's order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of		TSC 23-0629 (Tex. 2024) (footnotes omitted) ("The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no citizen 'shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law of the land.' An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights. We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court's order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.")
	substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.")

Admin: /* add */

2024-06-01T15:34:13Z

add

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, June 1, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

	== add ==		==add==

	The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no		TSC 23-0629 (footnotes omitted) ("The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no citizen 'shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law of the land.' An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights. We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court's order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of
	citizen ~~“shall~~ be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law		substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.")
	of the land.~~”57~~ An unsettled question in this Court is whether the
	due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural
	rights.58 We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course
	clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does
	not support the trial ~~court’s~~ order that the Human Life Protection Act
	violates the Texas Constitution.
	If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of
	substantive law and not just procedural protections before the
	government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.
	~~The due-course clause has referred to “life” since statehood.59~~

Admin: /* add */ new section

2024-06-01T15:31:34Z

add: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:31, June 1, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

			== add ==

			The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no
			citizen “shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law
			of the land.”57 An unsettled question in this Court is whether the
			due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural
			rights.58 We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course
			clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does
			not support the trial court’s order that the Human Life Protection Act
			violates the Texas Constitution.
			If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of
			substantive law and not just procedural protections before the
			government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.
			The due-course clause has referred to “life” since statehood.59

Admin at 14:25, June 1, 2024

2024-06-01T14:25:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:25, June 1, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

	~~== add ? ==~~

	~~Milliken v. Weatherford, 54 Tex. 388, 394 (1881) (invalidating a city ordinance that violated Due Course Clause substantive liberty protections or “common rights”).~~

74.194.29.76: /* add ? */ new section

2024-06-01T13:42:17Z

add ?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:42, June 1, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

			== add ? ==

			Milliken v. Weatherford, 54 Tex. 388, 394 (1881) (invalidating a city ordinance that violated Due Course Clause substantive liberty protections or “common rights”).

Admin: Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}NOTOC"

2023-07-02T15:10:33Z

Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}__NOTOC__"

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:10, July 2, 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}~~This~~ page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

Texas Constitution talk:Article I, Section 19 - Revision history

Admin at 13:35, June 19, 2025

74.194.29.76: /* add */ new section

74.194.29.76 at 13:59, June 10, 2024

74.194.29.76 at 21:05, June 9, 2024

Admin: /* add */

Admin: /* add */

Admin: /* add */ new section

Admin at 14:25, June 1, 2024

74.194.29.76: /* add ? */ new section

Admin: Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}__NOTOC__"

Admin: Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}NOTOC"