Texas Constitution talk:Article I, Section 4 - Revision history

Admin: /* add */

2025-06-12T00:14:28Z

add

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:14, June 11, 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

	~~==add==~~

	TSC 22-1145 Blacklock concurring ("If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct—that is, if Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe—then yet another deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. 'No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments . . . .' 8 TEX. CONST. art. I, § 4. Judge Hensley has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened 'on account of [her] religious sentiments'—not on account of rude or insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any sexual orientation.")

74.194.29.76 at 18:52, June 28, 2024

2024-06-28T18:52:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, June 28, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

	== add ==		==add==

	If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct—that is, if		TSC 22-1145 Blacklock concurring ("If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct—that is, if Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe—then yet another deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. 'No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments . . . .' 8 TEX. CONST. art. I, § 4. Judge Hensley has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened 'on account of [her] religious sentiments'—not on account of rude or insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any sexual orientation.")
	Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse
	traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe—then yet another
	deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. ~~“No~~ religious test
	shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in
	this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account
	of his religious sentiments . . . .”8 TEX. CONST. art. I, § 4. Judge Hensley
	has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the
	power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened
	~~“on~~ account of [her] religious ~~sentiments”—not~~ on account of rude or
	insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any
	sexual orientation

74.194.29.76: /* add */ new section

2024-06-28T18:50:20Z

add: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, June 28, 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

			== add ==

			If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct—that is, if
			Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse
			traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe—then yet another
			deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. “No religious test
			shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in
			this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account
			of his religious sentiments . . . .”8 TEX. CONST. art. I, § 4. Judge Hensley
			has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the
			power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened
			“on account of [her] religious sentiments”—not on account of rude or
			insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any
			sexual orientation

Admin: Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}NOTOC"

2023-07-02T15:04:22Z

Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}__NOTOC__"

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:04, July 2, 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}~~This~~ page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.		{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

imported>Admin at 14:35, October 1, 2022

2022-10-01T14:35:56Z

New page