Texas Constitution talk:Article V: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''. | {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''. | ||
== review == | ==add== | ||
https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1462696/240782.pdf | |||
==uncon !!!== | |||
''Shipley v. Harris County Democratic Executive Comm.'', 795 S.W.2d 766, ??? (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1990, orig. proceeding) (O'Connor dissenting) https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8290059364776106008 | |||
TSC https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6961250803558519300 | |||
==review== | |||
This Court has long treated actions filed by qui tam relators as | |||
justiciable. See, e.g., Malouf v. State ex rel. Ellis, 694 S.W.3d 712, 716 (Tex. | |||
2024); Mo. Pac. Ry. v. Shuford, 10 S.W. 408, 411 (Tex. 1888); Doss v. State, 6 | |||
Tex. 433, 434 (1851). The parties before us have not questioned justiciability | |||
in any court, and we decline to exercise our discretion to address it in denying | |||
this mandamus petition. See In re Coppola, 535 S.W.3d 506, 510 (Tex. 2017). | |||
https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1462908/241062c3.pdf | |||
In re Salon a la Mode, 629 S.W.3d 860 (Tex. 2020) Blacklock, J. concurring in the denial of mandamus relief | |||
Jones v. Alexander 59 S.W.2d 1080 (Tex. 1933) | Jones v. Alexander 59 S.W.2d 1080 (Tex. 1933) | ||
stone v brown 54 tex 330 re 1881 arb commission | stone v brown 54 tex 330 re 1881 arb commission | ||
Dabney, Judicial Reconstruction (Draft of a Revision of Art. V of the Constitution of Texas) (1928) 6 TEXAS LAw REVIEw 302 | |||
The complete Proposed Amendment is printed in (1946) 9 TEX. BAR . 347-354. According to a note, p. 351, the proposal has not been endorsed by the State Bar of Texas or any official agency thereof and it is not contemplated that it will come before the Directors of the State Bar this year for any official action. The plan also appears in the Council's Eighteenth Annual Report to the Governor and the Supreme Court (1946) 50-59. | The complete Proposed Amendment is printed in (1946) 9 TEX. BAR . 347-354. According to a note, p. 351, the proposal has not been endorsed by the State Bar of Texas or any official agency thereof and it is not contemplated that it will come before the Directors of the State Bar this year for any official action. The plan also appears in the Council's Eighteenth Annual Report to the Governor and the Supreme Court (1946) 50-59. | ||
103 Tex. L. Rev. 227 (2024-2025) Standing in Texas: Exploring Standing under the Original Meaning of the Texas Constitution | |||
https://texaslawreview.org/standing-in-texas-exploring-standing-under-the-original-meaning-of-the-texas-constitution/ | |||
==add== | |||
TSC 24-0426 IN RE DALLAS COUNTY | |||
TSC 23-0192 | |||
TSC 24-0573 | |||
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9598821373542203314&q=%22legislative+history%22&hl=en&as_sdt=4,241&as_ylo=2021 | |||