5,933
edits
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|recent= | |recent= | ||
* ''Perez v. City of San Antonio'', ___ S.W.3d ___, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3463690842371194617#p--- ___] (Tex. 2025) ("When the Texas Religious Services Clause applies, its force is absolute and categorical, meaning it forbids governmental prohibitions and limitations on religious services regardless of the government's interest in that limitation or how tailored the limitation is to that interest, but the scope of the clause's applicability is not unlimited, and it does not extend to governmental actions for the preservation and management of public lands. We express no opinion on whether the Free Exercise Clause or the Texas RFRA protect the religious liberties Perez asserts | * ''Perez v. City of San Antonio'', ___ S.W.3d ___, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3463690842371194617#p--- ___] (Tex. 2025) ("When the Texas Religious Services Clause applies, its force is absolute and categorical, meaning it forbids governmental prohibitions and limitations on religious services regardless of the government's interest in that limitation or how tailored the limitation is to that interest, but the scope of the clause's applicability is not unlimited, and it does not extend to governmental actions for the preservation and management of public lands. We express no opinion on whether the Free Exercise Clause or the Texas RFRA protect the religious liberties Perez asserts . . . .") | ||
|historic= | |historic= |