4,834
edits
Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 29 (view source)
Revision as of 11:54, July 3, 2023
, July 3, 2023Text replacement - ")↵↵}}" to ") |seo_title= |seo_keywords= |seo_description= |seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights }}"
imported>Admin No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - ")↵↵}}" to ") |seo_title= |seo_keywords= |seo_description= |seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights }}") |
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
* ''Rochelle v. Lane'', 148 S.W. 558, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/Vol_148_SWR_558.pdf#page=3 560] (Tex. 1912) ("The judgment, being a judicial act, cannot be reviewed by an executive officer. . . . It is urged that previous Comptrollers have exercised the same power for many years. If that be true, it is time that it should be known in Texas that a disregard of the Constitution by the usurpation of power on the part of officials is not sanctified by its long continuance, and that each officer should confine his acts to the limits of his power. We would not disparage the zeal of respondent nor challenge the honesty of his purpose, but the superiority of the Constitution must be sustained until the sovereign voters shall change it.") | * ''Rochelle v. Lane'', 148 S.W. 558, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/Vol_148_SWR_558.pdf#page=3 560] (Tex. 1912) ("The judgment, being a judicial act, cannot be reviewed by an executive officer. . . . It is urged that previous Comptrollers have exercised the same power for many years. If that be true, it is time that it should be known in Texas that a disregard of the Constitution by the usurpation of power on the part of officials is not sanctified by its long continuance, and that each officer should confine his acts to the limits of his power. We would not disparage the zeal of respondent nor challenge the honesty of his purpose, but the superiority of the Constitution must be sustained until the sovereign voters shall change it.") | ||
|seo_title= | |||
|seo_keywords= | |||
|seo_description= | |||
|seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights | |||
}} | }} | ||