4,834
edits
Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 9 (view source)
Revision as of 11:55, July 3, 2023
, July 3, 2023Text replacement - ")↵↵}}" to ") |seo_title= |seo_keywords= |seo_description= |seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights }}"
imported>Admin No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - ")↵↵}}" to ") |seo_title= |seo_keywords= |seo_description= |seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights }}") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
* ''Brown v. State'', 657 S.W.2d 797, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3685216097234250292#p799 799] (Tex.Crim.App. 1983) ("But it is not the function of the judiciary to engraft such changes upon our Constitution. . . . Since this Court's pronouncements in ''Crowell v. State'', ''supra'', almost forty years ago, there has been no groundswell to change the provisions of Article I, Section 9. And since that time, this Court has opted to interpret our Constitution in harmony with the Supreme Court's opinions interpreting the Fourth Amendment. We shall continue on this path until such time as we are statutorily or constitutionally mandated to do otherwise.") | * ''Brown v. State'', 657 S.W.2d 797, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3685216097234250292#p799 799] (Tex.Crim.App. 1983) ("But it is not the function of the judiciary to engraft such changes upon our Constitution. . . . Since this Court's pronouncements in ''Crowell v. State'', ''supra'', almost forty years ago, there has been no groundswell to change the provisions of Article I, Section 9. And since that time, this Court has opted to interpret our Constitution in harmony with the Supreme Court's opinions interpreting the Fourth Amendment. We shall continue on this path until such time as we are statutorily or constitutionally mandated to do otherwise.") | ||
|seo_title= | |||
|seo_keywords= | |||
|seo_description= | |||
|seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights | |||
}} | }} | ||