Texas Constitution:Article III, Section 24: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 23: Line 23:
And that, in Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. [https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1969/cm0408.pdf#page=6 M-408] (1969), he further opined that: "[T]here exists no constitutional inhibition as to the use of state funds and their application to group sickness and accident policy premium payments for legislators themselves. . . . We do not interpret such a benefit as additional 'salary', 'per diem' or 'mileage', as those terms are used in Article III, Section 24 of the Constitution of Texas."
And that, in Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. [https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1969/cm0408.pdf#page=6 M-408] (1969), he further opined that: "[T]here exists no constitutional inhibition as to the use of state funds and their application to group sickness and accident policy premium payments for legislators themselves. . . . We do not interpret such a benefit as additional 'salary', 'per diem' or 'mileage', as those terms are used in Article III, Section 24 of the Constitution of Texas."


Nevertheless, there exists a substantial question regarding the constitutionality of the the substantial and preferential retirement benefits currently provided to Texas legislators.
Nevertheless, there exists a substantial question regarding the constitutionality of the the significant and preferential retirement benefits currently provided to legislators.


|recent=
|recent=