Texas Constitution:Article III, Section 34: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 13: Line 13:
|historic=
|historic=


* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . . It would be our pleasure, because the particular piece of legislation under review, if it does not do full justice to an underpaid judiciary, is at least a commendable effort to do so.")
* ''King v. Terrell'', 218 S.W. 42, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/218_SW_42.pdf#page=3 44-45] (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1920, ref'd) ("We think the true and correct rule is that in passing upon the validity of a legislative act the courts should inspect the completed work and deal with it alone, and, if this is found to meet the constitutional requirements, they are not permitted to inquire whether the legislative workmen in the processes of their labors assembled imperfect material, employed defective tools, or worked during forbidden hours. . . . It would be our pleasure, because the particular piece of legislation under review, if it does not do full justice to an underpaid judiciary, is at least a commendable effort to do so.")


|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")
|seo_title=Article III, Section 34 of the Texas Constitution ("Defeated Bills and Resolutions")