Texas Constitution:Article III, Section 38: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
|historic=
|historic=


* ''Holman v. Pabst'', 27 S.W.2d 340, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/027_SW2_340.pdf#page=2 342] (Tex.Civ.App.–Galveston 1930, ref'd) (" ... .")
* ''Holman v. Pabst'', 27 S.W.2d 340, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/027_SW2_340.pdf#page=3 342] (Tex.Civ.App.–Galveston 1930, ref'd) (" ... .")


* ''Parshall v. State'', 138 S.W. 759, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/138_SW_759.pdf#page=5 763] (Tex.Crim.App. 1911) ("It is also contended by appellant that the said act of the Legislature is unconstitutional, in that article 3, § 38, just above mentioned, was violated, in that the journals of the Legislature do not show that the title of said act, as finally passed, was read in full at the time of the signature of the respective presiding officers of each House. From this provision of the Constitution it is seen that it does not require that the journals of the two Houses shall affirmatively show what the title of the bill enacted is or that the full title thereof was read.")
* ''Parshall v. State'', 138 S.W. 759, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/138_SW_759.pdf#page=5 763] (Tex.Crim.App. 1911) ("It is also contended by appellant that the said act of the Legislature is unconstitutional, in that article 3, § 38, just above mentioned, was violated, in that the journals of the Legislature do not show that the title of said act, as finally passed, was read in full at the time of the signature of the respective presiding officers of each House. From this provision of the Constitution it is seen that it does not require that the journals of the two Houses shall affirmatively show what the title of the bill enacted is or that the full title thereof was read.")