Texas Constitution:Article IV, Section 10: Difference between revisions

m
Text replacement - "Tap & B. Ry." to "Tap & Brazoria Ry."
imported>Admin
No edit summary
 
m (Text replacement - "Tap & B. Ry." to "Tap & Brazoria Ry.")
Line 23: Line 23:
* ''Hibler v. State'', 43 Tex. 197, [https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth28530/m1/213/ 203-04] (1875) ("This provision of the Constitution of the United States, requiring the surrender of fugitives from justice, is in the nature of a treaty stipulation between the States of the Union, and it is equally binding upon each State and all of the officers thereof . . . . When its execution is put into active operation by the proper authority of this State, the Governor, based upon the authentic information and demand as required by law, it is equally obligatory upon all of the officers of this State as is the enforcement of any criminal proceeding under the constitution and laws of this State.")
* ''Hibler v. State'', 43 Tex. 197, [https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth28530/m1/213/ 203-04] (1875) ("This provision of the Constitution of the United States, requiring the surrender of fugitives from justice, is in the nature of a treaty stipulation between the States of the Union, and it is equally binding upon each State and all of the officers thereof . . . . When its execution is put into active operation by the proper authority of this State, the Governor, based upon the authentic information and demand as required by law, it is equally obligatory upon all of the officers of this State as is the enforcement of any criminal proceeding under the constitution and laws of this State.")


* ''Houston Tap & B. Ry. Co. v. Randolph'', 24 Tex. 317, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/24_Tex._317.pdf#page=27 343] (1859) ("One other feature in this case, will be adverted to. The governor has manifested his wish, that this act should be performed, by joining with the attorney-general in signing the warrant. He is the head of the executive department of the State, and it is made his duty, by the Constitution, to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed.' It is evidently contemplated, that he shall give direction to the management of affairs, in all the branches of the executive department. Otherwise he has very little to do.")
* ''Houston Tap & Brazoria Ry. Co. v. Randolph'', 24 Tex. 317, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/24_Tex._317.pdf#page=27 343] (1859) ("One other feature in this case, will be adverted to. The governor has manifested his wish, that this act should be performed, by joining with the attorney-general in signing the warrant. He is the head of the executive department of the State, and it is made his duty, by the Constitution, to 'take care that the laws be faithfully executed.' It is evidently contemplated, that he shall give direction to the management of affairs, in all the branches of the executive department. Otherwise he has very little to do.")


* ''State v. Delesdenier'', 7 Tex. 76, [https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth28567/m1/54/ 95] (1851) ("It might, with much propriety, be said that it is the duty of the Executive of the State, under that provision of the Constitution which declares that 'he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed,' (art. 5, sec. 10,) to cause legal proceedings to be instituted by the proper law officers in all cases when the laws of the State are infracted or its rights invaded. But it would be a great neglect of duty on the part of the attorney general not to institute such proceedings when the opinion of the Legislature and Executive Departments as to its necessity has been clearly expressed.")
* ''State v. Delesdenier'', 7 Tex. 76, [https://texashistory.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metapth28567/m1/54/ 95] (1851) ("It might, with much propriety, be said that it is the duty of the Executive of the State, under that provision of the Constitution which declares that 'he shall take care that the laws be faithfully executed,' (art. 5, sec. 10,) to cause legal proceedings to be instituted by the proper law officers in all cases when the laws of the State are infracted or its rights invaded. But it would be a great neglect of duty on the part of the attorney general not to institute such proceedings when the opinion of the Legislature and Executive Departments as to its necessity has been clearly expressed.")