Texas Constitution talk:Article III, Section 56: Difference between revisions

m
Line 27: Line 27:
have been made applicable, or where it could not have been
have been made applicable, or where it could not have been
made applicable by reason of the fact that the legislation questioned was the result of direct obedience to some specific command of the Constitution.")
made applicable by reason of the fact that the legislation questioned was the result of direct obedience to some specific command of the Constitution.")
Stephensen v. Wood, 119 Tex. 564, 34 S.W.2d 246
Reed v. Rogan, 94 Tex. 177, 59 S.W. 255


x Langdeau v. Bouknight, 162 Tex. 42, 344 S.W.2d 435 (1961)
x Langdeau v. Bouknight, 162 Tex. 42, 344 S.W.2d 435 (1961)
Line 37: Line 32:
x Rios v. State, 162 Tex. Crim. 609, 288 S.W.2d 77 (1955)
x Rios v. State, 162 Tex. Crim. 609, 288 S.W.2d 77 (1955)


x Atwood v. Willacy County ND, 284 S.W.2d 275 (TCA 1955 n.r.e.)
x Atwood v. Willacy County ND, 284 S.W.2d 275 (TCA 1955 nre)


x San Antonio v. State, 270 S.W.2d 460 (TCA 1954, ref'd)
x San Antonio v. State, 270 S.W.2d 460 (TCA 1954 refd)


x King v. Sheppard, 157 S.W.2d 682 (TCA 1941 ref.w.m.)
x King v. Sheppard, 157 S.W.2d 682 (TCA 1941 refwm)


x Womack v. Carson, 123 Tex. 260, 65 S.W.2d 485 (1933)
x Womack v. Carson, 123 Tex. 260, 65 S.W.2d 485 (1933)


x Urban v. Harris County, 251 S.W. 594 (TCA-Galveston 1923, ref'd)
Stephensen v. Wood, 119 Tex. 564, 34 S.W.2d 246 (19??)
 
x Urban v. Harris County, 251 S.W. 594 (TCA 1923 refd)
 
Reed v. Rogan, 94 Tex. 177, 59 S.W. 255 (19??)


== true ==
== true ==