Texas Constitution talk:Article IV: Difference between revisions

Add topic
Active discussions
(→‎add to III: new section)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.


== add to III ==
== add to III ==
Line 13: Line 13:
e.g., State v. Clements, 319 S.W.2d 450, 453 (Tex. Civ. App.—Texarkana
e.g., State v. Clements, 319 S.W.2d 450, 453 (Tex. Civ. App.—Texarkana
1958, writ ref’d). It simply authorized legislation for its stated purpose."
1958, writ ref’d). It simply authorized legislation for its stated purpose."
== add ? ==
36 Tex. 382

Latest revision as of 09:24, August 21, 2023

This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page Article IV of the Texas Constitution.

add to IIIEdit

22-0256 BROWN v. CITY OF HOUSTON "That sovereign policy decision manifested itself in a constitutional amendment approved in November 1956, which authorizes the legislature to “grant aid and compensation to any person” fined or imprisoned “for an offense for which he or she is not guilty, under such regulations and limitations as the Legislature may deem expedient.” Tex. Const. art. III, § 51-c. The amendment was a cautious, aspirational step. It did not directly promise anything to anyone, for by its terms the amendment was not self-executing. See, e.g., State v. Clements, 319 S.W.2d 450, 453 (Tex. Civ. App.—Texarkana 1958, writ ref’d). It simply authorized legislation for its stated purpose."

add ?Edit

36 Tex. 382

Return to "Article IV" page.