Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main Page
Featured Article
Featured Question
Random Page
Search Page
Content
Legal Information
Questions/Answers
Attorney Directory
Ratings & Reviews
Legal Self-Help
Information
All Pages
All Categories
Recent Changes
Special Pages
Group Rights
Site Statistics
Contact
Submit Question
Contact Page
Search Page
Search
Appearance
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Log in
Personal tools
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Texas Constitution talk:Article I, Section 37
Add topic
Constitution
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Add topic
View history
General
What Links Here
Related Changes
Page Information
Navigation
Special Pages
Revision as of 10:25, October 22, 2025 by
Admin
(
talk
|
contribs
)
(
diff
)
← Older revision
|
Latest revision
(
diff
) |
Newer revision →
(
diff
)
Warning: You are editing an out-of-date revision of this page.
If you publish it, any changes made since this revision will be lost.
Note that your Internet Protocol ("IP") address will be publicly visible if you make an edit.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''. ==2025== This section, proposed by [https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=89R&Bill=SJR34 SJR 34], will be voted on at the 2025 constitutional amendment election. ==Tribune == This proposal would include parental rights, as currently outlined out in federal case law, in the Texas Constitution. The intent of the amendment is to protect parental rights since “case law can change and disappear over time with the appointment of new judges,” according to an analysis of the legislation. The constitution would be amended to include the following: “Provides that, to enshrine truths that are deeply rooted in this nation’s history and traditions, the people of Texas hereby affirm that a parent has the responsibility to nurture and protect the parent’s child and the corresponding fundamental right to exercise care, custody, and control of the parent’s child, including the right to make decisions concerning the child’s upbringing.” Some questions were raised during legislative discussions about how the proposal would ensure children’s voices are also heard. More recently, various advocacy groups have expressed opposition to the constitutional amendment’s broad language. Education and reproductive rights groups say other provisions in Texas law already recognize parental rights and that the amendment could be used to justify censorship and further restrict access to reproductive and gender-affirming care. The group Accountability Matters has also raised concerns that the vague language of the amendment could lead to costly legal fights over its meaning and enable more state oversight. ==HRO== Supporters say: By enshrining in the Texas Constitution the right of a parent to exercise care, custody, and control of the parent’s children, Proposition 15 would provide a clear and solid legal foundation to protect parental rights. Courts have long recognized that parents have a constitutionally protected right to make decisions for their children. This proposition would codify longstanding case law in the Texas Constitution to ensure that this important right could not be removed or diminished by future court opinions. The parent-child relationship is rooted in natural law and should be safeguarded. Proposition 15 also would make accessing the right simpler, less costly, and easier for parents and lawyers, allowing them to cite the Constitution to help defend their rights in court. Critics say: Proposition 15 focuses too heavily on the rights of parents without including language to ensure that children’s rights and best interests are protected. The proposition should further emphasize the duties and responsibilities of parents to their children so that parental rights cannot override fundamental children’s rights, such as the right to basic healthcare or mental health support, as well as the ability of children to have their psychological, emotional, and social needs met. Other critics say: While protecting parental rights is essential, Proposition 15 contains language that is too vague and, as worded, could impose obligations on parents or undermine parents’ rights if it were determined that parents have not met their responsibilities.
Summary:
Do not submit copyrighted material without express permission.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search Page
Search
Editing
Texas Constitution talk:Article I, Section 37
Add topic