Editing Texas Constitution talk:Article I, Section 4
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''. | {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''. | ||
==add== | == add == | ||
If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct—that is, if | |||
Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse | |||
traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe—then yet another | |||
deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. “No religious test | |||
shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in | |||
this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account | |||
of his religious sentiments . . . .”8 TEX. CONST. art. I, § 4. Judge Hensley | |||
has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the | |||
power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened | |||
“on account of [her] religious sentiments”—not on account of rude or | |||
insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any | |||
sexual orientation |