Editing Texas Constitution talk:Article I, Section 4

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Note that your Internet Protocol ("IP") address will be publicly visible if you make an edit.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.


==add==
== add ==


TSC 22-1145 Blacklock concurring ("If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct—that is, if Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe—then yet another deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. 'No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account of his religious sentiments . . . .'  8 TEX. CONST. art. I, § 4. Judge Hensley has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened 'on account of [her] religious sentiments'—not on account of rude or insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any sexual orientation.")
If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct—that is, if
Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse
traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe—then yet another
deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. “No religious test
shall ever be required as a qualification to any office, or public trust, in
this State; nor shall any one be excluded from holding office on account
of his religious sentiments . . . .”8 TEX. CONST. art. I, § 4. Judge Hensley
has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the
power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened
“on account of [her] religious sentiments”—not on account of rude or
insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any
sexual orientation
Do not submit copyrighted material without express permission.
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)