Texas Constitution talk:Article I, Section 19: Difference between revisions

From TLG
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}__NOTOC__")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
(→‎add: new section)
Tag: Reverted
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.
== add ==
The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no
citizen “shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law
of the land.”57 An unsettled question in this Court is whether the
due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural
rights.58 We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course
clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does
not support the trial court’s order that the Human Life Protection Act
violates the Texas Constitution.
If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of
substantive law and not just procedural protections before the
government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.
The due-course clause has referred to “life” since statehood.59

Revision as of 10:31, June 1, 2024

This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page Article I, Section 19 of the Texas Constitution.

add

The due-course clause of the Texas Constitution states that no citizen “shall be deprived of life . . . except by the due course of the law of the land.”57 An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights.58 We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court’s order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them. The due-course clause has referred to “life” since statehood.59