Texas Constitution talk:Article V: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== review == | == review == | ||
Jones v. Alexander 59 S.W.2d 1080 (Tex. 1933) | |||
stone v brown 54 tex 330 re 1881 arb commission | stone v brown 54 tex 330 re 1881 arb commission | ||
The complete Proposed Amendment is printed in (1946) 9 TEX. BAR . 347- | Dabney, Judicial Reconstruction (Draft of a Revision of Art. V of the Constitution of Texas) (1928) 6 TEXAS LAw REVIEw 302 | ||
354. According to a note, p. 351, the proposal has not been endorsed by the State | |||
Bar of Texas or any official agency thereof and it is not contemplated that it will | The complete Proposed Amendment is printed in (1946) 9 TEX. BAR . 347-354. According to a note, p. 351, the proposal has not been endorsed by the State Bar of Texas or any official agency thereof and it is not contemplated that it will come before the Directors of the State Bar this year for any official action. The plan also appears in the Council's Eighteenth Annual Report to the Governor and the Supreme Court (1946) 50-59. | ||
come before the Directors of the State Bar this year for any official action. The | |||
plan also appears in the Council's Eighteenth Annual Report to the Governor and | |||
the Supreme Court (1946) 50-59. | |||
Latest revision as of 16:16, May 31, 2024
This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page Article V of the Texas Constitution.
review[edit topic]
Jones v. Alexander 59 S.W.2d 1080 (Tex. 1933)
stone v brown 54 tex 330 re 1881 arb commission
Dabney, Judicial Reconstruction (Draft of a Revision of Art. V of the Constitution of Texas) (1928) 6 TEXAS LAw REVIEw 302
The complete Proposed Amendment is printed in (1946) 9 TEX. BAR . 347-354. According to a note, p. 351, the proposal has not been endorsed by the State Bar of Texas or any official agency thereof and it is not contemplated that it will come before the Directors of the State Bar this year for any official action. The plan also appears in the Council's Eighteenth Annual Report to the Governor and the Supreme Court (1946) 50-59.