Texas Constitution talk:Article IV, Section 15: Difference between revisions
imported>Admin No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''. | ||
== add == | == add == | ||
* ''Terrell v. King'', 14 S.W.2d 786, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/014_S.W.2d_786.pdf#page=6 791] (Tex. 1929) (emphasis in original) ("By Lt is no longer an open question in Texas | * ''Terrell v. King'', 14 S.W.2d 786, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/014_S.W.2d_786.pdf#page=6 791] (Tex. 1929) (emphasis in original) ("By Lt is no longer an open question in TexasLt is no longer an open question in Texas | ||
that a joint resolution of both bouses, approved by the Governor, reflects the command | |||
and will of the state in one of the modes prescribed by the Constitution, and is as binding | |||
as a statute. Since the Tax Survey Committee was to function only temporarily, a resolution of both houses, approved by the Governor, was the most appropriate method by | |||
which to create the committee and define its | |||
duties and finance its operations. Section 15, | |||
article 4, Constitution; 2 Bouv. Law Dict. (3d | |||
Revision) 170-1; State v. Delesdenier, 7 Tex. Scarborough & Wilson, of Abilene, and B. 96; Franklin v. Kesler, 25 Tex. 142; Weekes L. Russell, of Baird, for plaintiff in error. | |||
v. Galveston (Tex. Civ. App.) 51 S. W. 517, L/eachman & Gardere, of Dallas, for de- wherein writ of error was denied; Conley v. fendant in error. Texas Division of U. D. of | |||
== add == | == add == | ||
Latest revision as of 14:40, June 5, 2024
This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page Article IV, Section 15 of the Texas Constitution.
add[edit topic]
- Terrell v. King, 14 S.W.2d 786, 791 (Tex. 1929) (emphasis in original) ("By Lt is no longer an open question in TexasLt is no longer an open question in Texas
that a joint resolution of both bouses, approved by the Governor, reflects the command and will of the state in one of the modes prescribed by the Constitution, and is as binding as a statute. Since the Tax Survey Committee was to function only temporarily, a resolution of both houses, approved by the Governor, was the most appropriate method by which to create the committee and define its duties and finance its operations. Section 15, article 4, Constitution; 2 Bouv. Law Dict. (3d Revision) 170-1; State v. Delesdenier, 7 Tex. Scarborough & Wilson, of Abilene, and B. 96; Franklin v. Kesler, 25 Tex. 142; Weekes L. Russell, of Baird, for plaintiff in error. v. Galveston (Tex. Civ. App.) 51 S. W. 517, L/eachman & Gardere, of Dallas, for de- wherein writ of error was denied; Conley v. fendant in error. Texas Division of U. D. of
add[edit topic]
- Commercial Standard Fire & Marine Co. v. Comm’r of Ins., 429 S.W.2d 930,
google case (Tex.Civ.App.–Austin 1968, no writ) ("The Constitution draws a clear distinction between 'laws' and 'Resolutions.' Art. III, Sec. 30 provides that no law shall be passed except by bill. The Constitution places bills and resolutions in separate and distinct categories. Art. III, Sec. 34; State v. Delesdenier, 7 Tex. 76. Article 4, Sec. 15 of the Constitution indicates that a resolution takes effect when the Governor signs it.")