Texas Constitution talk:Article V: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}__NOTOC__") |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== review == | == review == | ||
The complete Proposed Amendment is printed in (1946) 9 TEX. BAR . 347- | Jones v. Alexander 59 S.W.2d 1080 (Tex. 1933) | ||
354. According to a note, p. 351, the proposal has not been endorsed by the State | |||
Bar of Texas or any official agency thereof and it is not contemplated that it will | stone v brown 54 tex 330 re 1881 arb commission | ||
come before the Directors of the State Bar this year for any official action. The | |||
plan also appears in the Council's Eighteenth Annual Report to the Governor and | Dabney, Judicial Reconstruction (Draft of a Revision of Art. V of the Constitution of Texas) (1928) 6 TEXAS LAw REVIEw 302 | ||
the Supreme Court (1946) 50-59. | |||
The complete Proposed Amendment is printed in (1946) 9 TEX. BAR . 347-354. According to a note, p. 351, the proposal has not been endorsed by the State Bar of Texas or any official agency thereof and it is not contemplated that it will come before the Directors of the State Bar this year for any official action. The plan also appears in the Council's Eighteenth Annual Report to the Governor and the Supreme Court (1946) 50-59. | |||
Latest revision as of 16:16, May 31, 2024
This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page Article V of the Texas Constitution.
review[edit topic]
Jones v. Alexander 59 S.W.2d 1080 (Tex. 1933)
stone v brown 54 tex 330 re 1881 arb commission
Dabney, Judicial Reconstruction (Draft of a Revision of Art. V of the Constitution of Texas) (1928) 6 TEXAS LAw REVIEw 302
The complete Proposed Amendment is printed in (1946) 9 TEX. BAR . 347-354. According to a note, p. 351, the proposal has not been endorsed by the State Bar of Texas or any official agency thereof and it is not contemplated that it will come before the Directors of the State Bar this year for any official action. The plan also appears in the Council's Eighteenth Annual Report to the Governor and the Supreme Court (1946) 50-59.