Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 32: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
mNo edit summary
Tag: Manual revert
mNo edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
The Texas Attorney General, in Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. [https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/2013/ga1003.pdf#page=6 GA-1003] (2013), opined that this section "prohibits political subdivisions from creating a legal status of domestic partnership."
The Texas Attorney General, in Tex. Att'y Gen. Op. [https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/2013/ga1003.pdf#page=6 GA-1003] (2013), opined that this section "prohibits political subdivisions from creating a legal status of domestic partnership."


The United States Supreme Court, in ''Obergefell v. Hodges'', 576 U.S. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11639600804719161589 644] (2015), subsequently held that the federal constitution guarantees the right to marry to same-sex couples.
The United States Supreme Court, in ''Obergefell v. Hodges'', 576 U.S. [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5003540832790792912 644] (2015), subsequently held that the federal constitution guarantees the right to marry to same-sex couples.


Note that whether the landmark ''Obergefell'' decision completely invalidated this section and a similar provision in the Texas Family Code has been the subject of additional litigation.
Note that whether the landmark ''Obergefell'' decision completely invalidated this section and a similar provision in the Texas Family Code has been the subject of additional litigation.