Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 4: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 13: Line 13:
|recent=
|recent=


* ''Hensley v. State Comm'n on Jud. Conduct'', 692 S.W.3d 184, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4865454919474533790#p190 190] (Tex. 2024) (............) ("If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct-that is, if Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe-then yet another deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. . . . Judge Hensley has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened 'on account of [her] religious sentiments'—not on account of rude or insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any sexual orientation.")
* ''Hensley v. State Comm'n on Jud. Conduct'', 692 S.W.3d 184, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4865454919474533790#p190 ???] (Tex. 2024) (J. Blacklock, concurring) ("If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct-that is, if Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe-then yet another deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. . . . Judge Hensley has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened 'on account of [her] religious sentiments'-not on account of rude or insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any sexual orientation.")


|historic=
|historic=