5,933
edits
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|recent= | |recent= | ||
* ''Hensley v. State Comm'n on Jud. Conduct'', 692 S.W.3d 184, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4865454919474533790#p190 | * ''Hensley v. State Comm'n on Jud. Conduct'', 692 S.W.3d 184, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4865454919474533790#p190 ???] (Tex. 2024) (J. Blacklock, concurring) ("If the Judicial Conduct Commission is correct-that is, if Obergefell ushered in an era in which judges who publicly espouse traditional Christian beliefs are unfit for the robe-then yet another deeply rooted constitutional principle comes into view. . . . Judge Hensley has been the target of a punitive administrative apparatus with the power, ultimately, to exclude her from holding office. This has happened 'on account of [her] religious sentiments'-not on account of rude or insulting or unprofessional words or actions towards anybody of any sexual orientation.") | ||
|historic= | |historic= |