Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 32: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
m (Text replacement - ")↵↵}}" to ") |seo_title= |seo_keywords= |seo_description= |seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights }}")
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
No edit summary
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Article I, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution (''<small>"Marriage"</small>'')}}{{Texas Constitution|text=Added November 8, 2005:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:Article I, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution (''<small>"Marriage"</small>'')}}{{Texas Constitution|text=Added November 8, 2005:


'''(a) Marriage in this state shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.'''
'''(a) Marriage in this State shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman.'''


'''(b) This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.'''
'''(b) This State or a political subdivision of this State may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage.'''


|editor=
|editor=
Line 12: Line 12:


Note that whether the landmark ''Obergefell'' decision completely invalidated this section and a similar provision in the Texas Family Code has been the subject of additional litigation.
Note that whether the landmark ''Obergefell'' decision completely invalidated this section and a similar provision in the Texas Family Code has been the subject of additional litigation.
|other=
None.


|recent=
|recent=
Line 25: Line 21:
|historic=
|historic=


* ''Frasher v. State'', 3 Tex.Ct.App. 263, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/3_Tex.Ct.App._263.pdf#page=14 276-77] (1877) ("It is, then, conceded that the states can prohibit the intermarriage of the races, and it therefore . . . . Can it be truly said that the law is illegal because the race sought to be protected by 'the amendments' and 'the Civil Rights Bill' is not punished? Civilized society has the power of self-preservation, and, marriage being the foundation of such society, most of the states in which the negro forms an element of any note have enacted laws inhibiting intermarriage between the white and black races. And the courts, as a general rule, have sustained the constitutionality of such statutes.")
* ''Frasher v. State'', 3 Tex.Ct.App. 263, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/003_TexCtApp_263.pdf#page=14 276-77] (1877) ("It is, then, conceded that the states can prohibit the intermarriage of the races, and it therefore . . . . Can it be truly said that the law is illegal because the race sought to be protected by 'the amendments' and 'the Civil Rights Bill' is not punished? Civilized society has the power of self-preservation, and, marriage being the foundation of such society, most of the states in which the negro forms an element of any note have enacted laws inhibiting intermarriage between the white and black races. And the courts, as a general rule, have sustained the constitutionality of such statutes.")


|seo_title=
|seo_title=Article I, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution ("Marriage")
|seo_keywords=
|seo_keywords=Article 1 Section 32, Texas DOMA, same-sex marriage
|seo_description=
|seo_description=This section declares: "Marriage in this State shall consist only of the union of one man and one woman."
|seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights
|seo_image_alt=Texas Bill of Rights


Line 37: Line 33:
[[Category:Family Law]]
[[Category:Family Law]]
[[Category:TxCon ArtI Sec]]
[[Category:TxCon ArtI Sec]]
[[Category:WikiSEO Extension]]{{#seo:|author=Steven W. Smith|section=Law|published_time=01-01-2015|title=Article I, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution ("Marriage")|keywords=Article 1 Section 32, Texas DOMA, same-sex marriage|description=Note that whether the landmark ''Obergefell'' decision completely invalidated Article I, Section 32 has been the subject of additional litigation.}}

Navigation menu