Editing Texas Constitution talk:Article III, Section 56

{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.

==add ?==

Thomas, Interpretative Commentary, I TEX. CONST. art. III, § 56 (1955)

Volume 25 American Jurisprudence (first ed.) Special Legislation 317

Morrison v. Bachert, 112 Pa. 322, 328 (purpose of restriction)

Ayars' App., 122 Pa. 266, 277 !!!!!

==review==

https://cite.case.law/pdf/1436032/Henderson%20v.%20Koenig,%20168%20Mo.%20356%20(1902).pdf

Stephensen v. Wood, 119 Tex. 564, 34 S.W.2d 246

Reed v. Rogan, 94 Tex. 177, 59 S.W. 255

San Antonio v. State 270 S.W.2d 460 (Tex.Civ.App. 1954, ref.)

Atwood v. Willacy County Navigation District, Tex.Civ.App., 284 S.W.2d 275 (n.r.e.)

King v. Sheppard, Tex.Civ.App., 157 S.W.2d 682 (ref.w.m.)

Langdeau v. Bouknight, 162 Tex. 42, 344 S.W.2d 435 (1961)

J. Keith, CITY AND COUNTY HOME RULE IN TEXAS 45 (1951)

Rios v. State, 162 Tex. Crim. 609, 288 S.W.2d 77 (1955)

San Antonio v. State ex rel. Criner, 270 S.W.2d 460 (Tex.Civ.App.-Austin 1954, ref'd)

Ex parte Carsen, 143 Tex. Crim. 498, 159 S.W.2d 126 (1942)

Anderson v. Wood, 137 Tex. 201, 152 S.W.2d 1084 (1941)

Womack v. Carson, 123 Tex. 260, 65 S.W.2d 485 (1933)

Smith v. State, 120 Tex. Crim. 431, 49 S.W.2d 739 (1932)

Urban v. Harris County, 251 S.W. 594 (Tex.Civ.App.-Galveston 1923, ref'd)

== true ==

all counties where the same circumstances exist must have the same form of government


so that a law for one class can reasonably be
expected to work equally well for every member of the
class ; while, if it works ill, it is almost certain to do so in
every case, and that for some cause which lies deeper than
the mere fact that the law is general. The number of
places necessarily affected by a law prevents, moreover, the
enactment of laws designed in the interest of one place
only. If such a law be against the interest of the other
communities affected by it, they will oppose its passage, and
thus the unfair grant of special privileges will be prevented