4,834
edits
m (→review) |
mNo edit summary |
||
(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 217: | Line 217: | ||
==houston== | ==houston== | ||
In re Mayor of New York, 246 N.Y. 72, 76 (1927) (author: Cardozo, C.J.) ("Home Rule for cities, adopted by the people with much ado and after many years of agitation, will be another Statute of Uses, a form of words and little else, if the courts in applying, the [new constitutional standard regarding the validity of local and special laws] shall ignore the new spirit that dictated their adoption. The municipality is to be protected in its autonomy against the inroads of evasion.") | |||
1930 Census: 1 Houston 292,352 2 Dallas 260,475 ... ; Acts 1933, 43rd R.S., ch. 94: "Article 6229. In all incorporated cities and towns having a population of two hundred eighty thousand or more according to the preceding Federal census ... constitute a Board of Trustees of the Municipal Employees' Pension Fund ...." | 1930 Census: 1 Houston 292,352 2 Dallas 260,475 ... ; Acts 1933, 43rd R.S., ch. 94: "Article 6229. In all incorporated cities and towns having a population of two hundred eighty thousand or more according to the preceding Federal census ... constitute a Board of Trustees of the Municipal Employees' Pension Fund ...." | ||
Line 285: | Line 287: | ||
x King v. Sheppard, 157 SW2d 682 (TCA 1941 wm) (cited TSC) | x King v. Sheppard, 157 SW2d 682 (TCA 1941 wm) (cited TSC) | ||