Texas Constitution talk:Article IV, Section 11: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "–discussion page}}" to "–discussion page}}__NOTOC__") Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
m (Text replacement - "{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__Texas Legal Guide (texaslegalguide.com) is currently under construction.↵↵This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''." to "{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''. | ||
== review == | == review == | ||
Latest revision as of 19:30, August 2, 2023
This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page Article IV, Section 11 of the Texas Constitution.
review[edit topic]
Ex parte Giles, 502 S.W.2d 774 (Tex.Crim.App. 1973) Ex parte Pitt, 206 S.W.2d 596,596 (Tex. Crim. App. 1947); see Ex parte Rice, 162 S. W. at 901 ("the right to grant pardons is conferred on the Governor by the Constitution, and in granting them his actions are not subject to review"); Ex parte Rice, 162 S.W. 891,900 (Tex. Crim. App. 1913) Ex parte Davenport, 7 S.W.2d 589,591 (Tex. Crim. App. 1927) ("It is essential to the validity of a conditional pardon that it be accepted by the person in whose favor it is issued."); Ex parte Frazier, 239 S.W. 972, 973 (Tex. Crim. App. 1922) (upholding Governor's revocation of a conditional pardon)
review[edit topic]
Jones v. State, 147 S.W.Zd 508,511 (T&x. Grim. App. 1941). Any rights of citizenship that were lost as a result of the wnviction constitute a plvt of the punishment for the crime, .so the governor also may restore such rights by pardon. Miller v. State. 79 S.W. 567. 567-68 (Tar. Grim. App. 1904) (pardon restores testimonial wmpetenq); see Eprrcnooad v. Srafe, 31 S.W. 2%. 2% (Tex. Grim. App. 1895) (fill pardon restores rights of jury service and sufkage)
Rrmo v. S&zfe, 556 S.W.2d 808, 809 vex. Grim. App. 1977
review[edit topic]
Ex Parte Anderson, 192 S.W.2d 280, 281-82 (Tex. Crim. App. 1946) (stating that the "power of the Legislature to authorize, by statute, [commutation] for good conduct is generally accepted")
add[edit topic]
Rose v State https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15239869118498721953&q=Rose+v.+State&hl=en&as_sdt=4,44