Texas Constitution talk:Article XIV and Texas Constitution talk:Article XIV, Section 1: Difference between pages

(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
(→‎add ?: new section)
 
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.
This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.
== review ==
7 Tex. 856
State v. Durham, 860 S.W.2d 63, 67 (Tex. 1993). The acts and conduct of the Land
Commissioner, including mistakes oflaw, cannot estop the state fromrecoveringpublic school lands
improperly conveyed. Texas Co. v. State, 281 S.W.2d 83,88 (Tex. 1955); Weatherlyv. Jackson, 71 S.W.2d 259,266 (Tex. 1934); see also Grayburg Oil Co. v. State, 50 S.W.2d 355, 358 (Tex. Civ.
App.-Austin 1932, writ ref d).


== add ? ==
== add ? ==


Board of Land Commissioners of Milam County v. Bell, 1 Dallam 366, 367 (1840) ("It is clear, then, that at the date of the declaration of independence the colonization laws were not of force, except so far as related to contracts in existence, or to families who had arrived previous to the 2d of May, 1835. The Constitution declares that all persons who resided in Texas on the day of the declaration of independence should be entitled to land in the proportions therein stated, but made no provision for allowing portions of lands as headrights to any who should arrive afterwards.")
40 Tex. 537
 
61 Tex. 378 (Tex. 1884)
WALLER M. BOOTH
v.
F. E. STRIPPLEMAN.
No. 726.
Supreme Court of Texas.
March 8, 1884
 
Booth v. Strippleman, 61 Tex. 378 (1884)
Anonymous user

Navigation menu