4,834
edits
Texas Constitution:Article IV, Section 1: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Texas Constitution:Article IV, Section 1 (view source)
Revision as of 10:33, September 14, 2023
, September 14, 2023no edit summary
m (Text replacement - "Tap & B. Ry." to "Tap & Brazoria Ry.") |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* ''Texas v. Cook'', 57 Tex. 205, [https://cite.case.law/pdf/2177561/State%20v.%20Cook,%2057%20Tex.%20205%20(1882).pdf#page=4 208] (1882) ("The point was made below, and is presented here, that the act authorizing the suit made no provision for service, and that in the absence of some such provision, service on the governor of the state was insufficient. We entertain no doubt that the court was authorized to treat this as good service. No statutory mode having been provided for bringing the state into court, it was competent for the court to recognize service on the chief executive officer of the state, or the attorney general, the legal representative of the state, as sufficient. Wheeler ''v''. State, 8 Tex., 230.") | * ''Texas v. Cook'', 57 Tex. 205, [https://cite.case.law/pdf/2177561/State%20v.%20Cook,%2057%20Tex.%20205%20(1882).pdf#page=4 208] (1882) ("The point was made below, and is presented here, that the act authorizing the suit made no provision for service, and that in the absence of some such provision, service on the governor of the state was insufficient. We entertain no doubt that the court was authorized to treat this as good service. No statutory mode having been provided for bringing the state into court, it was competent for the court to recognize service on the chief executive officer of the state, or the attorney general, the legal representative of the state, as sufficient. Wheeler ''v''. State, 8 Tex., 230.") | ||
* ''Houston Tap & Brazoria Ry. Co. v. Randolph'', 24 Tex. 317, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/ | * ''Houston Tap & Brazoria Ry. Co. v. Randolph'', 24 Tex. 317, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/024_Tex_317.pdf#page=27 343] (1859) ("This being the case in the United States government, results in the entire unity of its executive department. The absence of that absolute power of the chief executive in this state, must occasionally produce a want of harmony in the executive administration, by the inferior officers of that department, declining to comply with the wishes, or to follow the judgment of the governor. That is an inherent difficulty in the organization of that department, and the conflicts arising out of it, cannot be adjudicated or settled by the judiciary.") | ||
}} | }} | ||
[[Category:TxCon ArtIV Sec]] | [[Category:TxCon ArtIV Sec]] | ||