Texas Constitution talk:Article III, Section 56: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 219: Line 219:


cited with approval by County of Cameron v. Wilson, 326 S.W.2d 162, --- (Tex. 1959) = King v. Sheppard, 157 S.W.2d 682, 686-87 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1941, writ ref’d w.o.m.) ("It is also contended that since the appropriation is to purchase land in Brewster County, the act is a local law,, and was enacted without giving notice thereof as required by Sec. 57 of Art. 3 of the Texas Constitution. All public properties, such as parks, lakes, dams, and universities are necessarily located in one place, but are open to the use of all citizens alike, and the park in question is available to not only the people of Brewster County and Texas, but as well to all the people of the United States.")
cited with approval by County of Cameron v. Wilson, 326 S.W.2d 162, --- (Tex. 1959) = King v. Sheppard, 157 S.W.2d 682, 686-87 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1941, writ ref’d w.o.m.) ("It is also contended that since the appropriation is to purchase land in Brewster County, the act is a local law,, and was enacted without giving notice thereof as required by Sec. 57 of Art. 3 of the Texas Constitution. All public properties, such as parks, lakes, dams, and universities are necessarily located in one place, but are open to the use of all citizens alike, and the park in question is available to not only the people of Brewster County and Texas, but as well to all the people of the United States.")
Culberson County v. Holmes, 513 S.W.2d 126, 127 (Tex.Civ.App.-El Paso 1974, no writ) ("By this provision of the Constitution, the Legislature is denied the right to pass any special, private or local law, and, clearly, this is such a local and special law, for by its express terms it affects only Culberson County.")


==houston==
==houston==
Anonymous user

Navigation menu