Texas Constitution talk:Article IV, Section 15: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
m (Text replacement - "{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__Texas Legal Guide (texaslegalguide.com) is currently under construction.↵↵This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''." to "{{DISPLAYTITLE:{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution–discussion page}}__NOTOC__This page is available for comment and discussion regarding the page ''{{PAGENAME}} of the Texas Constitution''.") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== add == | == add == | ||
* ''Terrell v. King'', 14 S.W.2d 786, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/014_S.W.2d_786.pdf#page=6 791] (Tex. 1929) (emphasis in original) ("By Lt is no longer an open question in Texas | * ''Terrell v. King'', 14 S.W.2d 786, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/014_S.W.2d_786.pdf#page=6 791] (Tex. 1929) (emphasis in original) ("By Lt is no longer an open question in TexasLt is no longer an open question in Texas | ||
that a joint resolution of both bouses, approved by the Governor, reflects the command | |||
and will of the state in one of the modes prescribed by the Constitution, and is as binding | |||
as a statute. Since the Tax Survey Committee was to function only temporarily, a resolution of both houses, approved by the Governor, was the most appropriate method by | |||
which to create the committee and define its | |||
duties and finance its operations. Section 15, | |||
article 4, Constitution; 2 Bouv. Law Dict. (3d | |||
Revision) 170-1; State v. Delesdenier, 7 Tex. Scarborough & Wilson, of Abilene, and B. 96; Franklin v. Kesler, 25 Tex. 142; Weekes L. Russell, of Baird, for plaintiff in error. | |||
v. Galveston (Tex. Civ. App.) 51 S. W. 517, L/eachman & Gardere, of Dallas, for de- wherein writ of error was denied; Conley v. fendant in error. Texas Division of U. D. of | |||
== add == | == add == | ||