6,041
edits
Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 11-a: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 11-a (view source)
Revision as of 14:53, October 26, 2025
, Yesterday at 14:53no edit summary
Tag: Undo |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
|historic= | |historic= | ||
* ''Taylor v. State'', 667 S.W.2d 149, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18105305109371871550#p151 151-52] (Tex.Crim.App. 1984) (" .") | |||
* ''Ex parte Miles'', 474 S.W.2d 224, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8091587886437479777#p225 225] (Tex.Crim.App. 1971) ("We hold that the denial of bail to persons who have been charged with a felony offense less than capital with two prior convictions alleged in accordance with Article 1, Section 11a, supra, for a period of sixty days pending trial is reasonable and does not violate constitutional rights against a class. Appellant contends that the affidavits of the complaining witnesses are insufficient . . . . We hold that an accused is entitled to be confronted with the witnesses against him at the hearing under Article 1, Section 11a, supra, before bail can be denied.") | * ''Ex parte Miles'', 474 S.W.2d 224, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8091587886437479777#p225 225] (Tex.Crim.App. 1971) ("We hold that the denial of bail to persons who have been charged with a felony offense less than capital with two prior convictions alleged in accordance with Article 1, Section 11a, supra, for a period of sixty days pending trial is reasonable and does not violate constitutional rights against a class. Appellant contends that the affidavits of the complaining witnesses are insufficient . . . . We hold that an accused is entitled to be confronted with the witnesses against him at the hearing under Article 1, Section 11a, supra, before bail can be denied.") | ||