Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 3: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 58: Line 58:


* ''Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation v. Lewellen'', 952 S.W.2d 454, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14712011369692053572#p464 464-65] (Tex. 1997) (citations omitted) ("The Legislature has broad discretion in enacting social or economic legislation that does not classify on suspect categories, such as race, or impinge on fundamental rights. Under both federal and state equal protection analysis, such legislation is valid as long as it is rationally related to a legitimate state interest. . . . The equal protection clause is not, without more, violated merely because a law treats different geographic regions or political subdivisions differently, or because it allows political subdivisions the discretion to adopt or reject a statutory scheme.")
* ''Texas Boll Weevil Eradication Foundation v. Lewellen'', 952 S.W.2d 454, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14712011369692053572#p464 464-65] (Tex. 1997) (citations omitted) ("The Legislature has broad discretion in enacting social or economic legislation that does not classify on suspect categories, such as race, or impinge on fundamental rights. Under both federal and state equal protection analysis, such legislation is valid as long as it is rationally related to a legitimate state interest. . . . The equal protection clause is not, without more, violated merely because a law treats different geographic regions or political subdivisions differently, or because it allows political subdivisions the discretion to adopt or reject a statutory scheme.")
* ''Republican Party of Texas v. Dietz'', 940 S.W.2d 86, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12738540633429222592#p89 89-91] (Tex. 1997) ("The first clause of section 29 establishes that the purpose of the Texas Bill of Rights is to 'guard against transgressions of the high powers' delegated to the state government by the Texas Constitution. . . . Accordingly, based on the text of the Texas Bill of Rights, its history and purpose, our prior judicial decisions, the law in other jurisdictions, constitutional theory, and the concern for the liberty of all Texas citizens, we conclude that state action is required before a litigant can maintain a claim for deprivation of a right secured by the free speech, equal rights, and due course of law guarantees of the Texas Bill of Rights.")


|historic=
|historic=
Line 96: Line 94:


|seo_title=Featured Article: Article I, Section 3 of the Texas Constitution ("Equal Rights Provision")
|seo_title=Featured Article: Article I, Section 3 of the Texas Constitution ("Equal Rights Provision")
|seo_keywords=Article 1 Section 3, Texas equal rights provision, federal equal protection clause
|seo_keywords=Article 1 Section 3, state equal rights provision, federal equal protection clause
|seo_description=All freemen, when they form a social compact, have equal rights, and no man, or set of men, is entitled to exclusive separate public emoluments, or privileges, but in consideration of public services.
|seo_description=All freemen, when they form a social compact, have equal rights.
|seo_image_alt=Texas equal rights provision
|seo_image_alt=Texas equal rights provision


Navigation menu