Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 19: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
 
Line 12: Line 12:


|recent=
|recent=
* ''State v. Loe'', 692 S.W.3d 215, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9682881558926563485#p--- ---] (Tex. 2024) ("....")


* ''State v. Zurawski'', 690 S.W.3d 644, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7571856369762417682#p--- ___] (Tex. 2024) (footnote omitted) ("The due-course clause . . . . An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights. We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court's order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.")
* ''State v. Zurawski'', 690 S.W.3d 644, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7571856369762417682#p--- ___] (Tex. 2024) (footnote omitted) ("The due-course clause . . . . An unsettled question in this Court is whether the due-course clause protects substantive rights in addition to procedural rights. We need not decide this question today. Even if the due-course clause were to encompass substantive rights, the evidence adduced does not support the trial court's order that the Human Life Protection Act violates the Texas Constitution. If the due-course clause affords fundamental rights as a matter of substantive law and not just procedural protections before the government invades them, the right to life would be found among them.")