6,010
edits
Texas Constitution:Article I, Section 6 (view source)
Revision as of 15:48, October 24, 2025
, Yesterday at 15:48no edit summary
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* '' | * '' | ||
'', ___ S.W.3d ___, [ | '', ___ S.W.3d ___, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14056762347756447748#p--- ___] (Tex. 2025) (Young, concurring) ("Finally, and briefly, I turn to the question that in the end may prove most consequential: Given the Texas Constitution's distinct language and history, is its church-autonomy doctrine meaningfully different from its federal counterpart? As with other important constitutional guarantees, the answer is: 'We still do not really know, even as we approach the sesquicentennial of our current Constitution.' ''Tex. Dep’t of State Health Servs. v. Crown Distrib. LLC'', 647 S.W.3d 648, 664 (Tex. 2022) (Young, J., concurring).") | ||
https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14056762347756447748 | |||
#p--- ___] (Tex. 2025) (Young, concurring) (" | |||
* ''Perez v. City of San Antonio'', ___ S.W.3d ___, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3463690842371194617#p--- ___] n.9 (Tex. 2025) ("We have also applied strict scrutiny to the Texas Constitution's Freedom of Worship Clause, which is original to the 1876 Texas Constitution and provides in part: 'All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences,' and '. . . .' Tex. Const. art. I, § 6. For want of arguments to the contrary, we have assumed that the Freedom of Worship Clause provides protection that is 'coextensive' with the federal Free Exercise Clause and thus requires a strict-scrutiny analysis.") | * ''Perez v. City of San Antonio'', ___ S.W.3d ___, [https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3463690842371194617#p--- ___] n.9 (Tex. 2025) ("We have also applied strict scrutiny to the Texas Constitution's Freedom of Worship Clause, which is original to the 1876 Texas Constitution and provides in part: 'All men have a natural and indefeasible right to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences,' and '. . . .' Tex. Const. art. I, § 6. For want of arguments to the contrary, we have assumed that the Freedom of Worship Clause provides protection that is 'coextensive' with the federal Free Exercise Clause and thus requires a strict-scrutiny analysis.") | ||