Texas Constitution:Article III, Section 32: Difference between revisions

From TLG
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:


As adopted in 1876, this section read: "No bill shall have the force of a law until it has been read on three several days in each House, and free discussion allowed thereon; but in cases of imperative public necessity (which necessity shall be stated in a preamble or in the body of the bill), four-fifths of the House in which the bill may be pending may suspend this rule, the yeas and nays being taken on the question of suspension, and entered upon the journals." It has been amended once.
As adopted in 1876, this section read: "No bill shall have the force of a law until it has been read on three several days in each House, and free discussion allowed thereon; but in cases of imperative public necessity (which necessity shall be stated in a preamble or in the body of the bill), four-fifths of the House in which the bill may be pending may suspend this rule, the yeas and nays being taken on the question of suspension, and entered upon the journals." It has been amended once.
|other=
None.


|recent=
|recent=
Line 19: Line 15:
* ''Day Land & Cattle Co. v. State'', 4 S.W. 865, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/004_SW_865.pdf#page=9 873] (Tex. 1887) ("The constitution declares that the 'necessity shall be stated . . . .  If the legislature states facts or reasons which in its judgment authorize the suspension of the rule and the immediate passage of a bill, the courts certainly have no power to re-examine that question, and to declare that the legislature came to an erroneous conclusion. The legislature ascertains in its own way the facts on which it bases its action, and it is made the sole judge whether facts exist to authorize the immediate passage of a bill; and whatever facts or reasons it may give for such action must be held sufficient.")
* ''Day Land & Cattle Co. v. State'', 4 S.W. 865, [https://texaslegalguide.com/images/004_SW_865.pdf#page=9 873] (Tex. 1887) ("The constitution declares that the 'necessity shall be stated . . . .  If the legislature states facts or reasons which in its judgment authorize the suspension of the rule and the immediate passage of a bill, the courts certainly have no power to re-examine that question, and to declare that the legislature came to an erroneous conclusion. The legislature ascertains in its own way the facts on which it bases its action, and it is made the sole judge whether facts exist to authorize the immediate passage of a bill; and whatever facts or reasons it may give for such action must be held sufficient.")


|seo_title=Article III, Section _ of the Texas Constitution (" ... ")
|seo_title=Article III, Section 32 of the Texas Constitution ("Reading on Three Several Days")
|seo_keywords=Article 3 Section _, Texas Legislature, ...
|seo_keywords=Article 3 Section 32, Texas Legislature, ...
|seo_description=The legislative power of Texas is vested in a Senate and House of Representatives.
|seo_description=The legislative power of Texas is vested in a Senate and House of Representatives.
|seo_image=Texas_Constitution_of_1876_Article_3.jpg
|seo_image=Texas_Constitution_of_1876_Article_3.jpg

Revision as of 11:06, July 25, 2023

As amended November 2, 1999:

No bill shall have the force of a law until it has been read on three several days in each House, and free discussion allowed thereon; but four-fifths of the House, in which the bill may be pending, may suspend this rule, the yeas and nays being taken on the question of suspension, and entered upon the journals.

Editor Comments

As adopted in 1876, this section read: "No bill shall have the force of a law until it has been read on three several days in each House, and free discussion allowed thereon; but in cases of imperative public necessity (which necessity shall be stated in a preamble or in the body of the bill), four-fifths of the House in which the bill may be pending may suspend this rule, the yeas and nays being taken on the question of suspension, and entered upon the journals." It has been amended once.

Attorney Steve Smith

Recent Decisions

None.

Historic Decisions

  • Day Land & Cattle Co. v. State, 4 S.W. 865, 873 (Tex. 1887) ("The constitution declares that the 'necessity shall be stated . . . . If the legislature states facts or reasons which in its judgment authorize the suspension of the rule and the immediate passage of a bill, the courts certainly have no power to re-examine that question, and to declare that the legislature came to an erroneous conclusion. The legislature ascertains in its own way the facts on which it bases its action, and it is made the sole judge whether facts exist to authorize the immediate passage of a bill; and whatever facts or reasons it may give for such action must be held sufficient.")

Library Resources

Online Resources